By Naeem Khalid Janjua
This booklet experiences at the improvement and validation of a general defeasible good judgment programming framework for accomplishing argumentative reasoning in Semantic net functions (GF@SWA). The proposed technique is exclusive in supplying an answer for representing incomplete and/or contradictory details coming from varied assets, and reasoning with it. GF@SWA is ready to symbolize this kind of details, practice argumentation-driven hybrid reasoning to unravel conflicts, and generate graphical representations of the built-in details, therefore supporting choice makers in determination making procedures. GF@SWA represents the 1st argumentative reasoning engine for accomplishing computerized reasoning within the Semantic net context and is anticipated to have an important influence on destiny enterprise purposes. The e-book presents the readers with a close and transparent exposition of alternative argumentation-based reasoning concepts, and in their value and use in Semantic net functions. It addresses either teachers and execs, and may be of basic curiosity to researchers, scholars and practitioners within the sector of Web-based clever choice help platforms and their program in quite a few domains.
Read Online or Download A Defeasible Logic Programming-Based Framework to Support Argumentation in Semantic Web Applications PDF
Similar e-commerce books
Regardless of the Internet’s out of the ordinary influence on company and its achieve throughout all sectors, no version has emerged for thoughtfully valuing businesses’ web efforts. moreover, innovations for successfully competing during this atmosphere are only commencing to materialize. This publication addresses either one of those serious points of the web and provides enterprise versions and methods for larger realizing this significant phenomenon.
This e-book comprises the entire lawsuits of the 2015 Academy of promoting technological know-how international advertising and marketing Congress held in Bari, Italy. the present all over the world enterprise atmosphere is major advertising students and practitioners to re-examine a few old and present perspectives of and the way it services.
- Information Communication Technologies: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications
- E-Commerce and Web Technologies: 10th International Conference, EC-Web 2009, Linz, Austria, September 1-4, 2009. Proceedings
- Innovation and e-Learning: A Prospectus for an Educational Enterprise
- E-Commerce and M-Commerce Technologies
Additional info for A Defeasible Logic Programming-Based Framework to Support Argumentation in Semantic Web Applications
8 Significance of the Thesis The significance of this thesis can be discussed under two broad sections: scientific significance and social significance. 1 Scientific Significance Currently, there is no argumentative reasoning engine for carrying out automated reasoning in the Semantic Web context. This research will contribute significantly to the existing body of knowledge for building a framework which adheres to Web standards that can perform argumentative reasoning as a standalone component in Semantic Web applications.
MIT Press, Cambridge Antoniou G, Wagner G (2003) Rules and defeasible reasoning on the semantic web. In: Second international workshop rules and rule markup languages for the semantic web, vol 2876. Springer, Berlin, pp 111–120 Antoniou G, Skylogiannis T, Bikakis A, Doerr M, Bassiliades N (2007) Dr-brokering: a semantic brokering system. Knowl-Based Syst 20(1):61–72 Assche FV, Layzell P, Loucopoulos P, Speltincx G (1988) Information systems development: a rule-based approach. Knowl-Based Syst 1(4):227–234 28 1 Introduction Baader F, Horrocks I, Sattler U (2005) Description logics as ontology languages for the semantic web.
Grounds: Data and hard facts, plus the reasoning behind the claim to establish the foundation of the claim. 3. Warrants: Evidence and reasoning to justify the move from grounds to claim. Warrants are not self-validating. 4. Backing: The backing (or support) for an argument gives additional support to the warrant by answering different questions. 5. Modal qualification or degree of cogency: Qualifying the claim to express the degree of cogency or modal specification. This is the extent to which the argument is both sound and intellectually compelling.